Patriot Action
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
*Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
.
  • Search
  • Help
Hello There, Guest! Login Register
Login
Username:
Password:
Lost Password?
 
.
Join the discussions here at Patriot Action --->> New Registrations
Patriot Action › Earth Arena › The Science v
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »

Seminal 1967 Paper Introducing CO2 ‘Radiative Forcing’ Is Based On Assumptive Imagina

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode
Seminal 1967 Paper Introducing CO2 ‘Radiative Forcing’ Is Based On Assumptive Imagina
Sunsettommy Offline
Patriot Master
*******
Administrators
Posts: 5,460
Threads: 2,180
Thanks Received: 2,914 in 1,538 posts
Thanks Given: 713
Joined: Aug 2022
Reputation: 3,047
#1
07-12-24, 10:19 AM
No Tricks Zone

Seminal 1967 Paper Introducing CO2 ‘Radiative Forcing’ Is Based On Assumptive Imaginary-World Modeling

By Kenneth Richard on 12. July 2024

Excerpt:

A new study comprehensively eviscerates a 57-year-old modeling paper upon which nearly the entirety of the IPCC’s CO2-drives-climate paradigm is based.

Dr. Roy Clark has published a new 73-page study that rips apart the Manabe and Wetherald (1967) paper (MW67) that effectively hatched the IPCC-popularized concepts of CO2 climate sensitivity, radiative forcing, and positive/negative feedbacks so as to portray humans as predominantly responsible for climate changes.

The invalid, error-ridden conceptualization of a Earth land and ocean surface warmed by CO2 radiative forcing is one-dimensional and Flat Earth and assumes constant equilibrium, or perpetually steady states (that do not exist in the real world).

Even the most basic of assumptions in MW67 – that CO2 warms the Earth and ocean as its concentration is increased – is “largely a mathematical artifact produced by using a highly simplified one-dimensional radiative convective computer model.” CO2 climate sensitivity is but a calculation built on simplification errors.

LINK


=====================

Climate Models have been wrong too many times to continue following their trail of dog poop it leaves behind it is why I stopped reading them a few years ago as they are a waste of my time.
“A theory that is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific.” – Karl Popper

“The problem with following the science is that the science follows the money.” - CD in Wisconsin

"You have two parts of brain, 'left' and 'right'. In the left side, there's nothing right. In the right side, there's nothing left." -- Rutabaga

Terms of Service (Rules)

Moderation Guidelines

Announcements
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to Sunsettommy for this post:1 user says Thank You to Sunsettommy for this post
  • Billy_Bob
Find
Reply
Billy_Bob Offline
Patriot Master
*******
Webmaster
Posts: 4,290
Threads: 787
Thanks Received: 2,530 in 1,278 posts
Thanks Given: 1,640
Joined: Sep 2022
Reputation: 2,630
#2
07-14-24, 12:06 PM
Ah YES!  The misconception and fatally flawed modeling it created. A simple look at the oceans and the inability to warm them would have killed this model back then.  Politically driven science.... is always wrong..
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
*Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

  •
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Climate attribution method overstates “fingerprints” of external forcing Sunsettommy 2 526 12-19-23, 05:06 PM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Another Day, Another Scientific Paper Insists ‘Global Warming Is Not Caused By Increa Sunsettommy 1 564 12-09-23, 10:28 AM
Last Post: Billy_Bob

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
  • Forum Team
  • Contact Us
  • Patriot Action
  • Return to Top
  • Lite (Archive) Mode
  • Mark all forums read
  • RSS Syndication
Current time: 05-21-25, 06:02 AM Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.