12-07-24, 01:04 PM
Very interesting! A court that has no scientific training and can be duped because of that is going to make a decision on things they do not understand. What could go wrong?
The testimony, to date, has been all modeling speculation that does not mesh with observed physical evidence. In my opinion, as a scientist, this is a bad joke of a court. The court itself are far left activist judges, who side with total populace control and socialism.
The testimony, to date, has been all modeling speculation that does not mesh with observed physical evidence. In my opinion, as a scientist, this is a bad joke of a court. The court itself are far left activist judges, who side with total populace control and socialism.
Quote:THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — A closely-watched international climate case that could yield guidance for governments around the world wrapped its first week of arguments before the top court of the United Nations in The Hague Friday. The case, though not binding, is expected to spell out what countries are legally required to do to combat climate change and help vulnerable nations fight its devastating impact.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
*Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
*Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759