08-29-24, 03:41 PM
From HERE
WE, nice work.
Your fig. 1 is a real problem for the IPCC. It consistently says (AR4, 5, 6) cloud feedback is uncertain but significantly positive. (In fact, using Lindzen’s Bode feedback curve analysis from 2011 it is possible to show that IPCC has clouds at about half of the positive water vapor feedback.)
Fig 1 says it is not uncertain and significantly negative.
The IPCC statements are not based on Ceres observations. They are based on CMIP climate model outputs. Which is yet another way of showing climate models are bigly wrong.
WE, nice work.
Your fig. 1 is a real problem for the IPCC. It consistently says (AR4, 5, 6) cloud feedback is uncertain but significantly positive. (In fact, using Lindzen’s Bode feedback curve analysis from 2011 it is possible to show that IPCC has clouds at about half of the positive water vapor feedback.)
Fig 1 says it is not uncertain and significantly negative.
The IPCC statements are not based on Ceres observations. They are based on CMIP climate model outputs. Which is yet another way of showing climate models are bigly wrong.
“A theory that is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific.” – Karl Popper
“The problem with following the science is that the science follows the money.” - CD in Wisconsin
"You have two parts of brain, 'left' and 'right'. In the left side, there's nothing right. In the right side, there's nothing left." -- Rutabaga
Terms of Service (Rules)
Moderation Guidelines
Announcements
“The problem with following the science is that the science follows the money.” - CD in Wisconsin
"You have two parts of brain, 'left' and 'right'. In the left side, there's nothing right. In the right side, there's nothing left." -- Rutabaga
Terms of Service (Rules)
Moderation Guidelines
Announcements
