Patriot Action
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
*Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
.
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
  • Help
Hello There, Guest! Login Register
Login
Username/Email:
Password:
Lost Password?
 
.
Join the discussions here at Patriot Action --->> New Registrations
Patriot Action › Earth › Climate Discussions - News › Comment Discussions from outside the forum v
1 2 Next »

Rud Istvan comment

Thread Closed 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode
Rud Istvan comment
Sunsettommy Offline
Patriot Master
*******
Administrators
Posts: 1,843
Threads: 911
Joined: Aug 2022
Reputation: 67
#1
10-25-22, 08:52 PM
From HERE

The current AGW alarm is solely based on provably wrong climate models. This post is merely one proof. There are several others:

Christy has shown since 2017 that almost all models produce a tropical troposphere hotspot that radiosondes prove does not exist. The exception is INM CM5, which took pains to get (2) parameterized correctly.
ARGO has shown that models produce half the observed ocean rainfall. That means their water vapor feedback is too high, the likely reason for (1).

WE has just shown here that the CERES observed 21 years of cloud feedback is moderately negative. IPCC and models have it significantly positive. WE also showed that the negative feedback is remarkably constant over 4 separately analyzed 5/year sub periods.

Models predicted that Arctic amplification would have eliminated Arctic summer sea ice by about 2014. For 2022, the minimum was 4.68 Wadhams (million km^2, named in honor of the UK expert who most prominently made the erroneous prediction). This fact also supports Andy May’s ending conclusion.

Models predicted that sae level rise would accelerate.This goes back to Hansen about 1990. SLR has NOT accelerated. See my old post ‘Sea level rise, acceleration, and closure’ for details.

It only takes one proof to kill climate models. When there are at least 6, you are truly beating a dead horse. The reason modelers don’t acknowledge their horse is dead is simple. Money. Too many careers vested in climate modeling.
“A theory that is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific.” – Karl Popper

Terms of Service

Moderation Guidelines



Find
Billy_Bob Offline
Systems Administration
*******
Webmaster
Posts: 1,878
Threads: 448
Joined: Sep 2022
Reputation: 74
#2
10-26-22, 10:56 PM
(10-25-22, 08:52 PM)Sunsettommy Wrote: From HERE

The current AGW alarm is solely based on provably wrong climate models. This post is merely one proof. There are several others:

Christy has shown since 2017 that almost all models produce a tropical troposphere hotspot that radiosondes prove does not exist. The exception is INM CM5, which took pains to get (2) parameterized correctly.
ARGO has shown that models produce half the observed ocean rainfall. That means their water vapor feedback is too high, the likely reason for (1).

WE has just shown here that the CERES observed 21 years of cloud feedback is moderately negative. IPCC and models have it significantly positive. WE also showed that the negative feedback is remarkably constant over 4 separately analyzed 5/year sub periods.

Models predicted that Arctic amplification would have eliminated Arctic summer sea ice by about 2014. For 2022, the minimum was 4.68 Wadhams (million km^2, named in honor of the UK expert who most prominently made the erroneous prediction). This fact also supports Andy May’s ending conclusion.

Models predicted that sae level rise would accelerate.This goes back to Hansen about 1990. SLR has NOT accelerated. See my old post ‘Sea level rise, acceleration, and closure’ for details.

It only takes one proof to kill climate models. When there are at least 6, you are truly beating a dead horse. The reason modelers don’t acknowledge their horse is dead is simple. Money. Too many careers vested in climate modeling.

Excellent post!!!

Those two studies have decimated the whole AGW argument.  it has revealed so many flaws that it shows the hypothesis is less than useless.  Empirical verification has shown the AGW argument incorrect.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759


E-mail: systemadmin@patriotaction.us
Find
Sunsettommy Offline
Patriot Master
*******
Administrators
Posts: 1,843
Threads: 911
Joined: Aug 2022
Reputation: 67
#3
10-27-22, 12:34 AM
Yet we see people like Crick, Abu and Mamooth ignore the obvious and lies continually as they are so invested in the AGW nonsense.
“A theory that is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific.” – Karl Popper

Terms of Service

Moderation Guidelines



Find
Billy_Bob Offline
Systems Administration
*******
Webmaster
Posts: 1,878
Threads: 448
Joined: Sep 2022
Reputation: 74
#4
10-27-22, 09:02 PM
(10-27-22, 12:34 AM)Sunsettommy Wrote: Yet we see people like Crick, Abu and Mamooth ignore the obvious and lies continually as they are so invested in the AGW nonsense.

They refuse to look objectively. They are not scientists. Agenda trumps everything for these people, even if it might kill them.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759


E-mail: systemadmin@patriotaction.us
Find
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Thread Closed 


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Rud Istvan comment Sunsettommy 4 39 05-16-23, 02:49 PM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Rud Istvan's comment Sunsettommy 1 101 03-02-23, 11:30 AM
Last Post: Billy_Bob
  Rud Istvan comment Sunsettommy 0 151 11-01-22, 12:28 PM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Rud Istvan comment Sunsettommy 6 747 10-23-22, 08:19 AM
Last Post: Billy_Bob
  Rud Istvan comment Sunsettommy 2 358 10-22-22, 09:38 AM
Last Post: Billy_Bob

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
  • Forum Team
  • Contact Us
  • Patriot Action
  • Return to Top
  • Lite (Archive) Mode
  • Mark all forums read
  • RSS Syndication
Current time: 05-29-23, 04:06 PM Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2023 MyBB Group.